In addition to the world’s largest per-capita pledge to the United Nations fund, Israel has sent medical clinics and specialists to West Africa to help curb the spread of this deadly disease. Israel has pledged a whopping $8.75 million – the largest per-capita investment by any nation — to a United Nations fund aiming to combat the spread of the Ebola virus in West Africa. The donation to the UN’s Ebola Response Multi-Partner Fund comes after Israel already sent fully equipped medical clinics to West Africa and medical specialists to operate the clinics and train local health workers there. “We thank Israel for their generous contribution to help stop Ebola and for recognizing that children are especially vulnerable during emergencies,” said Caryl Stern, president and CEO of the US Fund for UNICEF. The Government of Israel also asked that a portion of the gift be earmarked to UNICEF, to provide services for children affected by the disease. According to a UNICEF press statement, Ebola has infected nearly 19,000 people and claimed over 6,900 lives across West Africa. (viaIsrael21c)
U.S. blasts Palestinian ICC move amid new fears of diplomatic scorched-earth campaign
Posted by Albert Gersh - December 31, 2014
Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas on Wednesday signed on to nearly two dozen international agreements, including the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court, setting up a showdown with the United States that The New York Times assessed could include "severe sanctions" from Washington and triggering accusations that the Palestinians were opening themselves up for war crimes accusations. Abbas had begun signaling last summer that he would seek Palestinian membership in the ICC, which had at the time renewed years of concerns regarding a kind of "scorched earth" campaign being conducted by the Ramallah: hijacking international forums to promote anti-Israel diplomacy at the expense of those forums’ viability and credibility. Wednesday's move was opposed by the U.S. State Department, which warned that it would "badly damage [the] atmosphere with the very people with whom [the Palestinians] ultimately need to make peace." Both the Israeli government and American observers noted that Palestinian ascension to the ICC would immediately make Ramallah vulnerable to war crimes prosecutions. An ICC focus on Israel rather than on the Palestinians will be treated as evidence that the institution has been politicized and distorted. Brett Schaefer, a fellow at the Margaret Thatcher Center for Freedom, had already severeal years ago contextualized Palestinian ICC membership alongside similar ones that the Palestinians had made in the United Nations General Assembly and in UNESCO. Ramallah immediately began using its membership in the latter to push for anti-Israel resolutions - at some points bragging openly about their success in doing so - triggering responses from Washington that financially crippled the organization. A similar dynamic played out in the United Nations Human Rights Council (UNHRC), which was hijacked with similar results. The Times quoted Khalil Shikaki, director of the Palestinian Center for Policy and Survey Research, noting that in the aftermath of today's move, "There is no question mark as to what are the consequences, that there will be immediate American and Israeli financial sanctions" and that "[t]hose sanctions will gradually become more and more crippling, and this could indeed be the beginning of the end of the P.A."
Do you like this post?